[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

# Motivation.

Some of the old exam questions that I did for preparation for the exam I liked, and thought I’d write up some of them for potential future reference.

# Questions from the Dec 2007 PHY355H1F exam.

## 1b. Parity operator.

\paragraph{Q:} If is the parity operator, defined by , where is the eigenket of the position operator with eigenvalue ), and is the momentum operator conjugate to , show (carefully) that .

\paragraph{A:}

Consider the matrix element . This is

We’ve taken advantage of the Hermitian property of and here, and can rearrange for

Since this is true for all and we have

Right multiplication by and rearranging we have

## 1f. Free particle propagator.

\paragraph{Q:} For a free particle moving in one-dimension, the propagator (i.e. the coordinate representation of the evolution operator),

is given by

\paragraph{A:}

This problem is actually fairly straightforward, but it is nice to work it having had a similar problem set question where we were asked about this time evolution operator matrix element (ie: what it’s physical meaning is). Here we have a concrete example of the form of this matrix operator.

Proceeding directly, we have

which is the desired result. Now, let’s look at how this would be used. We can express our time evolved state using this matrix element by introducing an identity

This gives us

However, note that our free particle wave function at time zero is

So the convolution integral 2.6 does not exist. We likely have to require that the solution be not a pure state, but instead a superposition of a set of continuous states (a wave packet in position or momentum space related by Fourier transforms). That is

The time evolution of this wave packet is then determined by the propagator, and is

or in terms of the position space wave packet evaluated at time zero

We see that the propagator also ends up with a Fourier transform structure, and we have

Does that Fourier transform exist? I’d not be surprised if it ended up with a delta function representation. I’ll hold off attempting to evaluate and reduce it until another day.

## 4. Hydrogen atom.

This problem deals with the hydrogen atom, with an initial ket

where

etc.

\paragraph{Q: (a)}

If no measurement is made until time ,

what is the ket just before the measurement is made?

\paragraph{A:}

Our time evolved state is

Also observe that this initial time was picked to make the exponential values come out nicely, and we have

so our time evolved state is just

\paragraph{Q: (b)}

Suppose that at time an measurement is made, and the outcome 0 is recorded. What is the appropriate ket right after the measurement?

\paragraph{A:}

A measurement with outcome 0, means that the operator measurement found the state at that point to be the eigenstate for eigenvalue 0. Recall that if is an eigenstate of we have

so a measurement of with outcome zero means that we have . Our measurement of at time therefore filters out all but the states and our new state is proportional to the projection over all states as follows

A final normalization yields

\paragraph{Q: (c)}

Right after this measurement, what is ?

\paragraph{A:}

Our amplitude is

so the probability density is

\paragraph{Q: (d)}

If then a position measurement is made immediately, which if any components of the expectation value of will be nonvanishing? Justify your answer.

\paragraph{A:}

The expectation value of this vector valued operator with respect to a radial state can be expressed as

where .

Consider one of the matrix elements, and expand this by introducing an identity twice

Because our state has only contributions, the only dependence for the and components of come from those components themselves. For , we therefore integrate , and for we integrate , and these terms vanish. Our expectation value for for this state, therefore lies completely on the axis.

# Questions from the Dec 2008 PHY355H1F exam.

## 1b. Trace invariance for unitary transformation.

\paragraph{Q:} Show that the trace of an operator is invariant under unitary transforms, i.e. if , where is a unitary operator, prove .

\paragraph{A:}

The bulk of this question is really to show that commutation of operators leaves the trace invariant (unless this is assumed). To show that we start with the definition of the trace

Thus we have

For the unitarily transformed operator we have

## 1d. Determinant of an exponential operator in terms of trace.

\paragraph{Q:} If is an Hermitian operator, show that

where the Determinant () of an operator is the product of all its eigenvectors.

\paragraph{A:}

The eigenvalues clue in the question provides the starting point. We write the exponential in its series form

Now, suppose that we have the following eigenvalue relationships for

From this the exponential is

We see that the eigenstates of are those of , with eigenvalues .

By the definition of the determinant given we have

## 1e. Eigenvectors of the Harmonic oscillator creation operator.

\paragraph{Q:} Prove that the only eigenvector of the Harmonic oscillator creation operator is .

\paragraph{A:}

Recall that the creation (raising) operator was given by

where . Now assume that so that

Write , and expand the LHS using 3.27 for

As usual write , and rearrange. This gives us

Observe that this can be viewed as a homogeneous LDE of the form

augmented by a forcing term . The homogeneous equation has the solution , so for the complete equation we assume a solution

Since , we produce a LDE of

or

This has solution , so our solution for 3.29 is

This wave function is an imaginary Gaussian with minimum at . It is also unnormalizable since we require for any if . Since , we must also have , completing the exercise.

## 2. Two level quantum system.

Consider a two-level quantum system, with basis states . Suppose that the Hamiltonian for this system is given by

where and are real positive constants.

\paragraph{Q: (a)} Find the energy eigenvalues and the normalized energy eigenvectors (expressed in terms of the basis). Write the time evolution operator using these eigenvectors.

\paragraph{A:}

The eigenvalue part of this problem is probably easier to do in matrix form. Let

Our Hamiltonian is then

Computing , we get

Let . Our normalized eigenvectors are found to be

In terms of and , we then have

Note that our Hamiltonian has a simple form in this basis. That is

Observe that once we do the diagonalization, we have a Hamiltonian that appears to have the form of a scaled projector for an open Stern-Gerlach aparatus.

Observe that the diagonalized Hamiltonian operator makes the time evolution operator’s form also simple, which is, by inspection

Since we are asked for this in terms of , and , the projectors are required. These are

Substitution into 3.42 and a fair amount of algebra leads to

Note that while a big cumbersome, we can also verify that we can recover the original Hamiltonian from 3.41 and 3.43.

\paragraph{Q: (b)}

Suppose that the initial state of the system at time is . Find an expression for the state at some later time , .

\paragraph{A:}

Most of the work is already done. Computation of follows from 3.44

\paragraph{Q: (c)}

Suppose that an observable, specified by the operator , is measured for this system. What is the probabilbity that, at time , the result is obtained? Plot this probability as a function of time, showing the maximum and minimum values of the function, and the corresponding values of .

\paragraph{A:}

The language of questions like these attempt to bring some physics into the mathematics. The phrase “the result is obtained”, is really a statement that the operator , after measurement is found to have the eigenstate with numeric value 1.

We can calcuate the eigenvectors for this operator easily enough and find them to be . For the positive eigenvalue we can also compute the eigenstate to be

The question of what the probability for this measurement is then really a question asking for the computation of the amplitude

From 3.45 we find this probability to be

We have a simple superposition of two sinusuiods out of phase, periodic with period . I’d attempted a rough sketch of this on paper, but won’t bother scanning it here or describing it further.

\paragraph{Q: (d)}

Suppose an experimenter has control over the values of the parameters and . Explain how she might prepare the state .

\paragraph{A:}

For this part of the question I wasn’t sure what approach to take. I thought perhaps this linear combination of states could be made to equal one of the energy eigenstates, and if one could prepare the system in that state, then for certain values of and one would then have this desired state.

To get there I note that we can express the states , and in terms of the eigenstates by inverting

Skipping all the algebra one finds

Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem helpful. I find

There’s no obvious way to pick and to leave just or . When I did this on paper originally I got a different answer for this sum, but looking at it now, I can’t see how I managed to get that answer (it had no factors of in the result as the one above does).

## 3. One dimensional harmonic oscillator.

Consider a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator with the Hamiltonian

Denote the ground state of the system by , the first excited state by and so on.

\paragraph{Q: (a)}

Evaluate and for arbitrary .

\paragraph{A:}

Writing in terms of the raising and lowering operators we have

so is proportional to

For we have

We are left with just

\paragraph{Q: (b)}

Suppose that at the system is prepared in the state

If a measurement of position were performaed immediately, sketch the propability distribution that a particle would be found within of . Justify how you construct the sketch.

\paragraph{A:}

The probability that we started in state and ended up in position is governed by the amplitude , and the probability of being within an interval , surrounding the point is given by

In the limit as , this is just the squared amplitude itself evaluated at the point , so we are interested in the quantity

We are given these wave functions in the supplemental formulas. Namely,

Substituting these into 3.57 we have

This \href{http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=graph+e^(-x^2)+(1+

\paragraph{Q: (c)}

Now suppose the state given in (b) above were allowed to evolve for a time , determine the expecation value of and at that time.

\paragraph{A:}

Our time evolved state is

The position expectation is therefore

We have already demonstrated that , so we must only expand the cross terms, but those are just . This leaves

For the squared position expectation

Noting that , and , so we see the last two terms are zero. The first two we can evaluate using our previous result 3.54 which was . This leaves

Since , we have

\paragraph{Q: (d)}

Now suppose that initially the system were prepared in the ground state , and then the resonance frequency is changed abrubtly from to so that the Hamiltonian becomes

Immediately, an energy measurement is performed ; what is the probability of obtaining the result ?

\paragraph{A:}

This energy measurement , corresponds to an observation of state , after an initial observation of . The probability of such a measurement is

Note that

The wave functions above are

Putting the pieces together we have

Since this is an odd integral kernel over an even range, this evaluates to zero, and we conclude that the probability of measuring the specified energy is zero when the system is initially prepared in the ground state associated with the original Hamiltonian. Intuitively this makes some sense, if one thinks of the Fourier coefficient problem: one cannot construct an even function from linear combinations of purely odd functions.