## Huygens diffraction

Posted by peeterjoot on October 23, 2013

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

We were presented with a diffraction result, that the intensity can be expressed as the Fourier transform of the aperture. Let’s review a derivation of that based on the Huygens principle. Consider the aperture of fig. 2.1.

The Huygens principle expresses the amplitude of a wave in terms of it’s amplitude at as

For multiple point diffraction, the diffracted wave is a superposition of such contributions from all points in the aperture. For example, two exponentials are summed when considering a two slit diffraction apparatus. For a more general aperture as above, we’d form

Note that this the Huygens result is an approximation in many ways. Fresnel later fixed up the proportionality factor and considered the angular dependence of the between the source and diffracted rays (the obliquity factor). That corrected result is known as the Huygens-Fresnel principle. Kirchhoff later considered solutions to the scalar wave equations for the electromagnetic field components and , ignoring the Maxwell coupling of these fields. See section 8.3.1 [1], section A.2 section 10.4 of [3], or section 5.2 of [2] for details. See section 9.8 [4] for a vector diffraction treatment.

Let’s proceed with using eq. 2.2 to obtain our result from class. For simplicity, first position the origin in the aperture itself as in fig. 2.2.

Now we are set to perform a first order expansion of the vector lengths and . It’s sufficient to consider just one of these, expanding to first order

Assume that both and to be far enough from the aperture that we can approximate the and terms downstairs as and respectively. Additionally, ignore the second order term above, significant for Fresnel diffraction where the diffraction pattern close to the aperture is examined, but not in the far field. This gives

Finally write

for

Finally, write

and introduce an aperture function (we called this the scattering density) that is unity for any regions of the aperture that light is allowed through, and zero when light is blocked, and some value in for translucent regions of the aperture. We can now expand the integral over the surface containing the aperture

# References

[1] M. Born and E. Wolf. Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Cambridge university press, 1980.

[2] G.R. Fowles. *Introduction to modern optics*. Dover Pubns, 1989.

[3] E. Hecht. *Optics*. 1998.

[4] JD Jackson. *Classical Electrodynamics Wiley*. John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition, 1975.

## Leave a Reply