# Peeter Joot's (OLD) Blog.

• ## Archives

 Adam C Scott on avoiding gdb signal noise… Ken on Scotiabank iTrade RESP …… Alan Ball on Oops. Fixing a drill hole in P… Peeter Joot's B… on Stokes theorem in Geometric… Exploring Stokes The… on Stokes theorem in Geometric…

• 292,413

## PHY452H1S Basic Statistical Mechanics. Lecture 1: What is statistical mechanics and equilibrium. Taught by Prof. Arun Paramekanti

Posted by peeterjoot on January 10, 2013

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting and figures if the post had any]

# Disclaimer

Peeter’s lecture notes from class. May not be entirely coherent.

# Equilibrium

This is the study of systems in equilibrium. What is equilibrium?

1. Mechanical equilibrium example: ball in bowl
2. Chemical equilibrium: when all the reactants have been consumed, or rates of forward and backwards reactions have become more constant.

More generally, equilibrium is a matter of time scales!

Feynman
“Fast things have happened and all slow things have not”

## Water in a cup

After 1 min – 1 hour, when any sloshing has stopped, we can say it’s in equilibrium. However, if we consider a time scale like 10 days, we see that there are changes occurring (evaporation).

## Hot water in a cup

Less than 10 minute time scale: Not in equilibrium (evaporating). At a longer time scale we may say it’s reached equilibrium, but again on a, say, 10 day time scale, we’d again reach the conclusion that this system is also not in equilibrium.

## Window glass

1. $\sim 10$ years $\rightarrow$ equilibrium.
2. $\sim 100-1000$ years $\rightarrow$ not in equilibrium.

While this was given in class as an example, [1] refutes this.

## Battery and resistor

Steady current over a small time scale, but we are persistently generating heat and draining the battery.

How do we reach equilibrium?

1. We’ll be looking at small systems connected to a very much larger “heat bath” or “environment”. Such a system will eventually, after perhaps exchange of particles, radiation, … will eventually take on a state that is dictated by the state of the environment.
2. Completely isolated system! Molecules in a box, say, may all initially be a corner of a box. We’ll have exchange of energy and momentum, and interaction with the walls of the box. The “final” state of the system will be determined by the initial state of the molecules. Experiments of this sort have recently been performed and studied in depth (actually a very tricky problem).

# Probabilities

Why do I need probabilities?

1. QM: Ultimately there’s an underlying quantum state, and we can only talk about probabilities. Any measurement has uncertainties, and this microscopic state forces us to use statistical methods.
2. Classical chaos and unpredictability: In a many particle system, or even a system of a few interacting particles with non-linear interaction, even given an initial state to 10 decimal places, we’ll end up with uncertainties. Given enough particles, even with simple interactions, we’ll be forced to use statistical methods.
3. Too much information: Even if we suppose that we could answer the question of where is and how fast every particle in a large collection was, what would we do with that info. We don’t care about such a fine granularity state. We want to know about things like gas pressure. We are forced to discard information.

We need a systematic way of dealing with and discarding specific details. We want to use statistical methods to throw away useless information.

Analogy: Election

We can poll a sample of the population if we want to attempt to predict results. We want to know things, but not what every person thinks.

# References

[1] YM Stokes. Flowing windowpanes: fact or fiction? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455 (1987): 2751–2756, 1999. URL http://albertorojo.com/BlogsTN/GlassStokes.pdf.