## PHY450H1S. Relativistic Electrodynamics Lecture 17 (Taught by Prof. Erich Poppitz). Energy and momentum density. Starting a Green’s function solution to Maxwell’s equation.

Posted by peeterjoot on March 8, 2011

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

# Reading.

Covering chapter 6 material \S 31, and starting chapter 8 material from the text [1].

Covering lecture notes pp. 128-135: energy flux and momentum density of the EM wave (128-129); radiation pressure, its discovery and significance in physics (130-131); EM fields of moving charges: setting up the wave equation with a source (132-133); the convenience of Lorentz gauge in the study of radiation (134); reminder on Greens functions from electrostatics (135) [Tuesday, Mar. 8]

# Review. Energy density and Poynting vector.

Last time we showed that Maxwell’s equations imply

In the lecture, Professor Poppitz said he was free here to use a full time derivative. When asked why, it was because he was considering and here to be functions of time only, since they were measured at a fixed point in space. This is really the same thing as using a time partial, so in these notes I’ll just be explicit and stick to using partials.

Any change in the energy must either due to currents, or energy escaping through the surface.

The energy flux of the EM field: this is the energy flowing through in unit time ().

# How about electromagnetic waves?

In a plane wave moving in direction .

PICTURE: , , .

So, since .

for a plane wave is the amount of energy through unit area perpendicular to in unit time.

Recall that we calculated

Since we had , we have , and our Poynting vector follows nicely

latex \times$ area}} = \frac{\text{momentum speed}}{\text{time area}}\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(3.8)$

latex \times$ area speed}} \\ &= \frac{\text{momentum}}{\text{area distance}} \\ &= \frac{\text{momentum}}{\text{volume}} \\ \end{aligned} $

So we wee that is indeed rightly called “the momentum density” of the EM field.

We will later find that and are components of a rank-2 four tensor

where is the stress tensor. We will get to all this in more detail later.

For EM wave we have

(this is the energy flux)

(the momentum density of the wave).

(recall for massless particles.

EM waves carry energy and momentum so when absorbed or reflected these are transferred to bodies.

Kepler speculated that this was the fact because he had observed that the tails of the comets were being pushed by the sunlight, since the tails faced away from the sun.

Maxwell also suggested that light would extort a force (presumably he wrote down the “Maxwell stress tensor” that is named after him).

This was actually measured later in 1901, by Peter Lebedev (Russia).

PICTURE: pole with flags in vacuum jar. Black (absorber) on one side, and Silver (reflector) on the other. Between the two of these, momentum conservation will introduce rotation (in the direction of the silver).

This is actually a tricky experiment and requires the vacuum, since the black surface warms up, and heats up the nearby gas molecules, which causes a rotation in the opposite direction due to just these thermal effects.

Another example (a factor) that prevents star collapse under gravitation is the radiation pressure of the light.

# Moving on. Solving Maxwell’s equation

Our equations are

where we assume that is a given. Our task is to find , the fields.

Proceed by finding . First, as usual when . The Bianchi identity is satisfied so we focus on the current equation.

In terms of potentials

or

We want to work in the Lorentz gauge . This is justified by the simplicity of the remaining problem

Write

where

This is the d’Alembert operator (“d’Alembertian”).

Our equation is

(in the Lorentz gauge)

If we learn how to solve (**), then we’ve learned all.

Method: Green’s function’s

In electrostatics where , only, we have

Solution

PICTURE:

(a small box)

acting through distance , acting at point . With , we have

Also since is deemed a linear operator, we have , we find

We end up finding that

thus solving the problem. We wish next to do this for the Maxwell equation 4.20.

The Green’s function method is effective, but I can’t help but consider it somewhat of a cheat, since one has to through higher powers know what the Green’s function is. In the electrostatics case, at least we can work from the potential function and take it’s Laplacian to find that this is equivalent (thus implictly solving for the Green’s function at the same time). It will be interesting to see how we do this for the forced d’Alembertian equation.

# References

[1] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz. *The classical theory of fields*. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980.

## Leave a Reply