## PHY450H1S. Relativistic Electrodynamics Lecture 11 (Taught by Prof. Erich Poppitz). Action for the field.

Posted by peeterjoot on February 10, 2011

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

# Reading.

Covering chapter 3 material from the text [1].

Covering lecture notes pp. 84-102: relativity, gauge invariance, and superposition principles and the action for the electromagnetic field coupled to charged particles (91-95); the 4-current and its physical interpretation (96-102), including a needed mathematical interlude on delta-functions of functions (98-100) [Wednesday, Feb. 8; Thursday, Feb. 10]

Covering lecture notes pp.103-113: variational principle for the electromagnetic field and the relevant boundary conditions (103-105); the second set of Maxwells equations from the variational principle (106-108); Maxwells equations in vacuum and the wave equation in the nonrelativistic Coulomb gauge (109-111); the wave equation in the relativistic Lorentz gauge (112-113) [Tuesday, Feb. 15; Wednesday, Feb.16]…

# Where we are.

We learned that one half of Maxwell’s equations comes from the Bianchi identity

the other half (for vacuum) is

To get here we have to consider the action for the field.

# Generalizing the action to multiple particles.

We’ve learned that the action for a single particle is

This generalizes to more particles

lables the particles, and , is the worldline of particle .

# Action for the field.

However, and are created by charged particles and can “move” or “propagate” on their own. EM field is its own dynamical system. The variables are . These are the “”.

The values of is the dynamical degrees of freedom. This is a system with a continum of dynamical degrees of freedom.

We need to write an action for this continuous field system , and need some principles to guide the construction of this action.

When we have an action with many degrees of freedom, we sum over all the particles. The action for the electromagnetic field

The quantity

is called the Lagrangian density, since the quantity

is actually the Lagrangian.

While this may seem non-relativistic, with both and in the integration range, because we have both, it is actually relativistic. We are integrating over all of spacetime, or the region where the EM fields are non-zero.

We write

which is a Lorentz scalar.

We write our action as

and demand that the Lagrangian density must also be an invariant (Lorentz) scalar in .

\paragraph{Analogy}: 3D rotations

Here is a 3-scalar, invariant under rotations.

\paragraph{Principles for the action}

\begin{enumerate}

\item Relativity.

\item Gauge invariance. Whatever we write, it must be gauge invariant, impliying that it be a function of only. Recall that we can adjust by a four-gradient of any scalar, but the quantities and were gauge invariant, and so must also be.

If we don’t impose gauge invariance, then the resulting dynamical system will contain more than just and . i.e. It will not be electromagnetism.

\item Superposition principle. The sum of two solutions is a solution. This implies linearity of the equations for .

\item Locality. Could write

This would allow for fields that have aspects that effect the result from disjoint positions or times. This would probably result in non-causal results as well as the possibility of non-local results.

\end{enumerate}

Principle 1 means we must have

and principle 2

and principle 1, means we must have a four scalar.

Without principle 3, we could have products of these, but we rule this out due to violation of non-linearity.

\paragraph{Example. Lagrangian for the Harmonic oscillator}

This gives

However, if we have

we get

In HW3, you’ll show that

only depends on at (the boundary). Because this depends only on spatial or time infinities, it can not affect the variational principle.

This is very much like in classical mechanics where we can add any total derivative to the Lagrangian. This does not change the Euler-Lagrange equation evaluation in any way. The invariant has the same effect.

The invariants possible are , , …, but we are now done, and know what is required. Our action must depend on squared.

Written in full with the constants in the right places we have

To get the equation of motion for we need to vary .

# Current density distribution.

Before we do the variation, we want to show that

where

We substitute in the integral

From this we see that we have

Physical meaning of

Minkowski diagram at angle , with axis up and axis on horiztontal.

To evaluate the integral, we have only the contribution from . Recall that

This scaling of the delta function, kills a factor of above, and leaves us with

The current is non-zero only on the worldline of the particle. We identify

so that our current can be interpretted as the charge and current density

Except for the delta functions these are just the quantities that we are familiar with from the RHS of Maxwell’s equations.

# References

[1] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshits. *The classical theory of fields*. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980.

## Leave a Reply