## My submission for PHY356 (Quantum Mechanics I) Problem Set 5.

Posted by peeterjoot on December 7, 2010

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

# Grading notes.

The pdf version above has been adjusted after seeing the comments from the grading. [Click here for the PDF for the original submission, as found below, uncorrected.

# Problem.

## Statement

A particle of mass m moves along the x-direction such that . Is the state

where is given by Eq. (9.60), is a constant, and time , an energy eigenstate of the system? What is probability per unit length for measuring the particle at position at ? Explain the physical meaning of the above results.

## Solution

### Is this state an energy eigenstate?

Recall that , , and . With this variable substitution Schr\”{o}dinger’s equation for this harmonic oscillator potential takes the form

While we can blindly substitute a function of the form into this to get

and formally make the identification , this isn’t a normalizable wavefunction, and has no physical relevance, unless we set .

By changing the problem, this state could be physically relevant. We’d require a potential of the form

latex x < a$} \\ \frac{1}{{2}} K x^2 & \quad \mbox{if $latex a < x ** b$} \\ \end{array}\right.\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(2.3)$**

For example, , for constant . For such a potential, within the harmonic well, a general solution of the form

is possible since normalization would not prohibit non-zero values in that situation. For the wave function to be a physically relevant, we require it to be (absolute) square integrable, and must also integrate to unity over the entire interval.

### Probability per unit length at .

We cannot answer the question for the probability that the particle is found at the specific position at (that probability is zero in a continuous space), but we can answer the question for the probability that a particle is found in an interval surrounding a specific point at this time. By calculating the average of the probability to find the particle in an interval, and dividing by that interval’s length, we arrive at plausible definition of probability per unit length for an interval surrounding

latex x = x_0$} =\lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{{\epsilon}} \int_{x_0 – \epsilon/2}^{x_0 + \epsilon/2} {\left\lvert{ \Psi(x, t_0) }\right\rvert}^2 dx = {\left\lvert{\Psi(x_0, t_0)}\right\rvert}^2\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(2.5)$

By this definition, the probability per unit length is just the probability density itself, evaluated at the point of interest.

Physically, for an interval small enough that the probability density is constant in magnitude over that interval, this probability per unit length times the length of this small interval, represents the probability that we will find the particle in that interval.

### Probability per unit length for the non-normalizable state given.

It seems possible, albeit odd, that this question is asking for the probability per unit length for the non-normalizable wavefunction 2.1. Since normalization requires , that probability density is simply zero (or undefined, depending on one’s point of view).

### Probability per unit length for some more interesting harmonic oscillator states.

Suppose we form the wavefunction for a superposition of all the normalizable states

Here it is assumed that the coefficients yield unit probability

For the impure state of 2.6 we have for the probability density

Evaluation at the point , we have

It is interesting that the probability per unit length only has time dependence for a mixed state.

For a pure state and its wavefunction we have just

This is zero for odd . For even is appears that may equal (this is true at least up to n=4). If that’s the case, we have for non-mixed states, with even numbered energy quantum numbers, at a probability per unit length value of .

## Leave a Reply