Force free relativistic motion.
Posted by peeterjoot on November 15, 2009
Considering the Euler-Lagrange solutions for the relativistic force free covariant Lagrangian
we get a set of four constant momentum equations
Can we make some sense of this? While this seems natural enough in comparision to Newtonian physics, we “just” add a component when switching to a four vector representation, the factors that one may expect are nowhere obvious to be seen.
A decomposition into an explicit spacetime split looks like it is the first step along the path to resolves this
Considering first the time component of our equations of motion we have
For the spatial components we have
With a switch to upper indexes, the remaining three equations of motion are then just
The math seems to be saying that relativistically, in the abscence of forces, we have constant velocity in our rest frame. This constant velocity is relative to the initial time component of the four velocity. This is not what I would have expected from the relativisitically corrected Newtons laws in three vector form
In this equation it appears that we should only expect constant velocity in the small speed limit where can be neglected. If we, however, take this equation and run with it, where does it lead? Introducing a vector constant for the spatial momentum we have
We can now square and rearrange, yielding
With the additional assumption that and are colinear we can take roots (the two could differ by an arbitrary spatial rotation), yielding
Just as seen starting from the covariant Lagrangian, we have constant spatial velocity in the abscence of external forces. There was no fundamental inconsistency between the covariant result and the relativistically corrected Newtonian force law. It was just not initially obvious to me that this was the case.