Peeter Joot's (OLD) Blog.

Math, physics, perl, and programming obscurity.

Covariant Maxwell equation in media (CGS units)

Posted by peeterjoot on August 10, 2009

[Click here for a PDF of this post with nicer formatting]

Motivation, some notation, and review.

Adjusting to Jackson’s of CGS ([1]) and Maxwell’s equations in matter takes some work. A first pass at a GA form was assembled in ([2]), based on what was in the introduction chapter for media that includes \mathbf{P}, and \mathbf{M} properties. He later changes conventions, and also assumes linear media in most cases, so we want something different than what was previously derived.

The non-covariant form of Maxwell’s equation in absence of current and charge has been convenient to use in some initial attempts to look at wave propagation. That was

\begin{aligned}F &= \mathbf{E} + I\mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon} \\ 0 &= (\boldsymbol{\nabla} + \sqrt{\mu\epsilon} \partial_0) F \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(1)

To examine the energy momentum tensor, it is desirable to express this in a fashion that has no such explicit spacetime dependence. This suggests a spacetime gradient definition that varies throughout the media.

\begin{aligned}\nabla \equiv \gamma^m \partial_m + \sqrt{\mu\epsilon} \gamma^0 \partial_0 \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(3)

Observe that this spacetime gradient is adjusted by the speed of light in the media, and isn’t one that is naturally relativistic. Even though the differential form of Maxwell’s equation is implicitly defined only in a neighborhood of the point it is evaluated at, we now have a reason to say this explicitly, because this non-isotropic condition is now hiding in the (perhaps poor) notation for the operator. Ignoring the obscuring nature of this operator, and working with it, we can can that Maxwell’s equation in the neighborhood (where \mu\epsilon is “fixed”) is

\begin{aligned}\nabla F = 0 \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(4)

We also want a variant of this that includes the charge and current terms.

Linear media.

Lets pick Jackson’s equation (6.70) as the starting point. A partial translation to GA form, with \mathbf{D} = \epsilon \mathbf{E}, and \mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{H}, and \partial_0 = \partial/\partial ct is

\begin{aligned}\boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{B} &= 0 \\ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \epsilon \mathbf{E} &= 4 \pi \rho \\ -I \boldsymbol{\nabla} \wedge \mathbf{E} + \partial_0 \mathbf{B} &= 0 \\ -I \boldsymbol{\nabla} \wedge \mathbf{B}/\mu - \partial_0 \epsilon \mathbf{E} &= \frac{4 \pi}{c} \mathbf{J} \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(5)

Scaling and adding we have

\begin{aligned}\boldsymbol{\nabla} \mathbf{E} + \partial_0 I \mathbf{B} &= \frac{4 \pi \rho}{\epsilon} \\ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \mathbf{B} - I \partial_0 \mu \epsilon \mathbf{E} &= \frac{4 \pi \mu I}{c} \mathbf{J} \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(9)

Once last scaling prepares for addition of these last two equations

\begin{aligned}\boldsymbol{\nabla} \mathbf{E} + \sqrt{\mu\epsilon}\partial_0 I \mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon} &= \frac{4 \pi \rho}{\epsilon} \\ \boldsymbol{\nabla} I \mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon} + \partial_0 \sqrt{\mu \epsilon} \mathbf{E} &= -\frac{4 \pi \mu }{c\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}\mathbf{J} \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(11)

This gives us a non-covariant assembly of Maxwell’s equations in linear media

\begin{aligned}(\boldsymbol{\nabla} + \sqrt{\mu\epsilon}\partial_0) F &= \frac{4 \pi}{c} \left( \frac{c \rho}{\epsilon} - \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon}} \mathbf{J} \right) \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(13)

Premultiplication by \gamma_0, and utilizing the definition of (3) we have

\begin{aligned}\nabla F &= \frac{4 \pi}{c} \left( c \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} \gamma_0 + \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon}} J^m \gamma_m \right) \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(14)

We can then define

\begin{aligned}J \equiv \frac{c \rho}{\epsilon} \gamma_0 + \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon}} J^m \gamma_m \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(15)

and are left with an expression of Maxwell’s equation that puts space and time on a similar footing. It’s probably not really right to call this a covariant expression since it isn’t naturally relativistic.

\begin{aligned}\nabla F &= \frac{4 \pi}{c} J \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(16)

Energy momentum tensor.

My main goal was to find the GA form of the stress energy tensor in media. With the requirement for both an alternate spacetime gradient and the inclusion of the scaling factors for the media it is not obviously clear to me how to do translate from the vacuum expression in SI units to the CGS in media form. It makes sense to step back to see how the divergence conservation equation translates with both of these changes. In SI units our tensor (a four vector parametrized by another direction vector a) was

\begin{aligned}T(a) \equiv \frac{-1}{2\epsilon_0} F a F \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(17)

Ignoring units temporarily, let’s calculate the media-spacetime divergence of -FaF/2. That is

\begin{aligned}-\frac{1}{{2}} \nabla \cdot (FaF)&=-\frac{1}{{2}} \left\langle{{\nabla (FaF)}}\right\rangle \\ &=-\frac{1}{{2}} \left\langle{{(F(\stackrel{ \rightarrow }\nabla F) + (F\stackrel{ \leftarrow }\nabla)F) a}}\right\rangle \\ &=-\frac{4\pi}{c} \left\langle{{\frac{1}{{2}}(F J - J F) a}}\right\rangle \\ &=-\frac{4\pi}{c} (F \cdot J) \cdot a \\  \end{aligned}

We want the T^{\mu 0} components of the tensor T(\gamma_0). Noting the anticommutation relation for the pseudoscalar I \gamma_0 = -\gamma_0 I, and the anticommutation behavior for spatial vectors such as \mathbf{E} \gamma_0 = -\gamma_0 we have

\begin{aligned}-\frac{1}{{2}} (\mathbf{E} + I\mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}) \gamma_0 (\mathbf{E} + I\mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon})&=\frac{\gamma_0}{2} (\mathbf{E} - I\mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}) (\mathbf{E} + I\mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}) \\ &=\frac{\gamma_0}{2} \left( (\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2/{\mu\epsilon}) + I \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} (\mathbf{E}\mathbf{B} - \mathbf{B}\mathbf{E}) \right) \\ &=\frac{1}{2} (\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2/{\mu\epsilon}) + \gamma_0 I \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} (\mathbf{E} \wedge \mathbf{B}) \\ &=\frac{\gamma_0}{2} (\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2/{\mu\epsilon}) - \gamma_0 \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B}) \\ &=\frac{\gamma_0}{2} (\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2/{\mu\epsilon}) - \gamma_0 \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} \gamma_m \gamma_0 (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B})^m \\ &=\frac{\gamma_0}{2} (\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2/{\mu\epsilon}) + \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} \gamma_m (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B})^m \\  \end{aligned}

Calculating the divergence of this using the media spacetime gradient we have

\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{{2}} F \gamma_0 F \right)&=\frac{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}{c} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \frac{1}{2} \left(\mathbf{E}^2 + \frac{1}{{\mu\epsilon}}\mathbf{B}^2\right)+ \sum_m\frac{\partial}{\partial x^m} \left( \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B})^m \right) \\ &=\frac{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}{c} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \frac{1}{2} \left(\mathbf{E}^2 + \frac{1}{{\mu\epsilon}}\mathbf{B}^2 \right)+ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \left( \frac{1}{{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}}} (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B})^m \right) \end{aligned}

Multiplying this by (c/4\pi) \sqrt{\epsilon/\mu}, we have

\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \left( -\frac{c}{8 \pi} \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} F \gamma_0 F \right)&=\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \frac{1}{2} \left(\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{D} + \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{H} \right) + \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \frac{c}{4\pi}(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H}) \\ &=- \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}}(F \cdot J) \cdot \gamma_0 \\  \end{aligned}

Now expand the RHS. We have

\begin{aligned}\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}}(F \cdot J) \cdot \gamma_0&=\left((\mathbf{E} + I \mathbf{B}/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}) \cdot \left( \frac{\rho}{\sqrt{\mu\epsilon}} \gamma_0 + J^m \gamma_m \right) \right) \cdot \gamma_0  \\ &=\left\langle{{E^q \gamma_q \gamma_0 J^m \gamma_m \gamma_0}}\right\rangle \\ &=\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{J} \end{aligned}

Assembling results the energy conservation relation, first in covariant form is

\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \left( -\frac{c}{8 \pi} \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} F a F \right) &= - \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}}(F \cdot J) \cdot a \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(18)

and the same with an explicit spacetime split in vector quantities is

\begin{aligned}\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \frac{1}{2} \left(\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{D} + \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{H} \right) + \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \frac{c}{4\pi}(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H})&=-\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{J} \end{aligned} \quad\quad\quad(19)

The first of these two (18) is what I was after for application to optics where the radiation field in media can be expressed directly in terms of F instead of \mathbf{E} and \mathbf{B}. The second sets the dimensions appropriately and provides some confidence in the result since we can compare to the well known Poynting results in these units.

References

[1] JD Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics Wiley. 2nd edition, 1975.

[2] Peeter Joot. Macroscopic Maxwell’s equation [online]. http://sites.google.com/site/peeterjoot/math2009/macroscopic_maxwell.pdf.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: