Motivation.
Here’s a variation of a problem outlined in section 2 of [1], which looked at the time evolution of fluid with initial rotational motion, after the (cylindrical) rotation driver stops, later describing this as the spin down of a cup of tea. I’ll work the problem in more detail than in the text, and also make two refinements.
- I drink coffee and not tea.
- I stir my coffee in the interior of the cup and not on the outer edge.
Because of the second point I’ll model my stir stick as a rotating cylinder in the cup and not by somebody spinning the cup itself to stir the tea. This only changes the solution for the steady state part of the problem.
Guts
We’ll work in cylindrical coordinates following the conventions of figure (1).
We’ll assume a solution that with velocity azimuthal in direction, and both pressure and velocity that are only radially dependent.
Let’s first verify that this meets the non-compressible condition that eliminates the term from Navier-Stokes
Good. Now let’s express each of the terms of Navier-Stokes in cylindrical form. Our time dependence is
Our inertial term is
Our pressure term is
and our Laplacian term is
Putting things together, we find that Navier-Stokes takes the form
which nicely splits into an separate equations for the and
directions respectively
Steady state solution
Before we seek the steady state, the solution of
We’ve seen that
is the general solution, and can now fit this to the boundary value constraints. For the interior portion of the cup we have
so is required. For the interface of the “stir-stick” (moving fast enough that we can consider it having a cylindrical effect) at
we have
so the interior portion of our steady state coffee velocity is just
Between the cup edge and the stir-stick we have to solve
or
Subtracting we find
so our steady state coffee flow is
latex r \in [0, R_1]$} \\ \frac{\Omega R_1^2}{R_2^2 – R_1^2} \left( \frac{R_2^2}{r} -r \right)\hat{\boldsymbol{\phi}}& \quad \mbox{
} \\ \end{array}\right.\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(2.19)$
Time evolution.
We can use a separation of variables technique with to find
which gives us
and specified by
Checking [2] (9.1.1) we see that this can be put into the standard form of the Bessel equation if we eliminate the term. We can do that writing
,
and noting that
and
, which gives us
The solutions are
From (9.1.5) of the handbook we see that the plus and minus variations are linearly dependent since and
, and from (9.1.8) that
is infinite at the origin, so our general solution has to be of the form
In the text, I see that the transformation (where
was the radius of the cup) is made so that the Bessel function parameter was dimensionless. We can do that too but write
Our boundary value constraint is that we require this to match 2.19 at . Let’s write
,
,
, so that we are working in the unit circle with
. Our boundary problem can now be expressed as
latex z \in [0, a]$} \\ \frac{1}{\frac{R^2}{a^2} – 1} \left( \frac{1}{{z}} – z\right)& \quad \mbox{
} \\ \end{array}\right.\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(2.27)$
Let’s pull the factor into
and state the problem to be solved as
latex z \in [0, a]$} \\ \frac{a^2}{1 – a^2} \left( \frac{1}{{z}} – z\right)& \quad \mbox{
} \\ \end{array}\right..\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(2.28c)$
Looking at section 2.7 of [3] it appears the solutions for can be obtained from
where are the zeros of
.
To get a feel for these, a plot of the first few of these fitting functions is shown in figure (2).
Using Mathematica in bottomlessCoffee.cdf, these coefficients were calculated for . The
approximations to the fitting function are plotted with a comparison to the steady state velocity profile in figure (3).
As indicated in the text, the spin down is way too slow to match reality (this can be seen visually in the worksheet by animating it).
References
[1] D.J. Acheson. Elementary fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, USA, 1990.
[2] M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun. {\em Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables}, volume 55. Dover publications, 1964.
[3] H. Sagan. Boundary and eigenvalue problems in mathematical physics. Dover Pubns, 1989.


