# Peeter Joot's Blog.

• ## Archives

 ivor on Just Energy Canada nasty busin… A final pre-exam upd… on An updated compilation of note… Anon on About peeterjoot on About Anon on About
• ## People not reading this blog: 6,973,738,433 minus:

• 132,898 hits

## Typo in Landau Mechanics problem? Nope.

Posted by peeterjoot on July 14, 2012

# Motivation

Attempting a mechanics problem from Landau I get a different answer. I wrote up my solution to see if I can spot either where I went wrong, or demonstrate the error, and then posted it to physicsforums. I wasn’t wrong, but the text wasn’t either. Here’s the complete result.

# Guts

## Question: Pendulum with support moving in circle

section 1 problem 3a of [1] is to calculate the Lagrangian of a
pendulum where the point of support is moving in a circle (figure and full text for problem in this google books reference)

The coordinates of the mass are

\begin{aligned}p = a e^{i \gamma t} + i l e^{i\phi},\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.1)

or in coordinates

\begin{aligned}p = (a \cos\gamma t + l \sin\phi, -a \sin\gamma t + l \cos\phi).\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.2)

The velocity is

\begin{aligned}\dot{p} = (-a \gamma \sin\gamma t + l \dot{\phi} \cos\phi, -a \gamma \cos\gamma t - l \dot{\phi} \sin\phi),\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.3)

and in the square

\begin{aligned}\dot{p}^2 = a^2 \gamma^2 + l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 - 2 a \gamma \dot{\phi} \sin\gamma t \cos\phi + 2 a \gamma l \dot{\phi} \cos \gamma t \sin\phi=a^2 \gamma^2 + l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 + 2 a \gamma l \dot{\phi} \sin (\gamma t - \phi).\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.4)

For the potential our height above the minimum is

\begin{aligned}h = 2a + l - a (1 -\cos\gamma t) - l \cos\phi = a ( 1 + \cos\gamma t) + l (1 - \cos\phi).\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.5)

In the potential the total derivative $\cos\gamma t$ can be dropped, as can all the constant terms, leaving

\begin{aligned}U = - m g l \cos\phi, \end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.6)

so by the above the Lagrangian should be (after also dropping the constant term $m a^2 \gamma^2/2$

\begin{aligned}\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{{2}} m \left( l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 + 2 a \gamma l \dot{\phi} \sin (\gamma t - \phi) \right) + m g l \cos\phi.\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.7)

This is almost the stated value in the text

\begin{aligned}\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{{2}} m \left( l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 + 2 a \gamma^2 l \sin (\gamma t - \phi) \right) + m g l \cos\phi.\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.8)

We have what appears to be an innocent looking typo (text putting in a $\gamma$ instead of a $\dot{\phi}$), but the subsequent text also didn’t make sense. That referred to the omission of the total derivative $m l a \gamma \cos( \phi - \gamma t)$, which isn’t even a term that I have in my result.

In the physicsforum response it was cleverly pointed out by Dickfore that 1.7 can be recast into a total derivative

\begin{aligned}m a l \gamma \dot{\phi} \sin (\gamma t - \phi) =m a l \gamma ( \dot{\phi} - \gamma ) \sin (\gamma t - \phi) +m a l \gamma^2 \sin (\gamma t - \phi) =\frac{d{{}}}{dt}\left(m a l \gamma \cos (\gamma t - \phi) \right)+m a l \gamma^2 \sin (\gamma t - \phi),\end{aligned} \hspace{\stretch{1}}(1.9)

which resolves the connundrum!

# References

[1] LD Landau and EM Lifshitz. Mechanics, vol. 1. 1976.